6/01/2006

Hows Them Apples! Stephen Noll bites into his dream.

Stephen Noll, in the Church Newspaper online has written an article, a brief commentary on an Anglican Covenant, in which, in considering the time it will take for an Anglican Covenant to be developed and actually put in place, he offers the following provision or proposal:

“Until the Covenant process is complete, no Province will unilaterally violate an established Anglican article of faith and practice, in particular Lambeth Resolution 1.10. Any Province refusing to abide by this provision, will forfeit its role in the process and be replaced by an entity which is willing to abide by it.”

How’s them apples!

  1. Stephen Noll suggests that Lambeth Resolution 1.10 of the 1998 Lambeth Conference is an article of faith.

  2. He states clearly the dream scenario: That the Episcopal Church refuses to abide by this provision (jacking up 1.10 to an article of faith) and will forfeit its place in the Anglican Communion to another entity willing to abide by it. (Wonder who?)

The blurb on the Church Newspaper says, “The Rev Prof Stephen Noll is Vice Chancellor of Uganda Christian University and author of ‘The Global Anglican Covenant: A Blueprint.’”

The paper, “The Global Anglican Covenant: A Blueprint,” is worth the read. But this suggested “provision” is transparently wishful thinking, based on an awful idea, namely that any statement of any Lambeth Conference at any time could possibly be an “article of faith.” If membership in the Anglican Communion were to require this, we would indeed be at a moment of new reformation, needing to shed Lambeth 1.10 as we did the notion that the Pope as the Vicar of Christ can make statements are infallible.

This provision is just that - a vision looking for a right time coming. But that right time will not come, I think. Instead Noll has bitten from an apple of temptation and dream, and it will not nurish or sustain.




"Saving Anglicanism": Read This Important Essay!

“Saving Anglicanism” an essay by Dr. Lionel Deimel, Progressive Episcopalians of Pittsburgh board member and past president, has just been published on the PEP website. It stands together with his recent essay, “What should General Convention 2006 do?” (reviewed on my blog ) as an important set of documents for those making decisions at General Convention 2006.

While “What should General Convention 2006 do?” addressed the specifics of the Special Commission resolutions without an historical analysis of the reasons why the resolutions respond as they do, “Saving Anglicanism” looks at the broader context of the struggles within the Episcopal Church for its future and at the possibility of moving beyond the sense of crisis to a new understanding of our role in saving Anglicanism from itself.

I highly recommend this essay. Good reading!