10/01/2008

Anticipation and the Denouement: Thursday and Saturday

Well these are days of anticipation and denouement. To see how bad it gets, click here:



No matter how we cut it, the anticipation will have its gaseous moments and in the end we will be fed ground meat and remainder, sugared over with something red.

It's Thursday night in American and do we know where our children are? Many too many people are likely to be viewing the Vice Presidential Debate and too few thinking about any future, for the children or otherwise. This thing will get more viewing than it deserves. There will be a lot of farting around and everyone will make of it what they will. In anything like a sane world this would not be called a debate at all. This is like going to a car race to watch and see if there are any crashes. What a mess.

If Governor Palin crashes and burns she is still the Vice Presidential candidate of the Republican Party but of course the real question will be not her judgment but that of the Presidential Candidate. We will see.


Meanwhile, on Saturday in Anglican Land the delegates to the Diocesan Convention in Pittsburgh will vote on changes which they believe will take the Diocese out of the Episcopal Church and into a bright future first in the Province of the Southern Cone and then in a new improved Anglican Province of North America. Whatever happens on Saturday in terms of debate, the talking is mostly over and the anticipated vote will be taken. There will be those who will be watching there as well for the crashing of cars and ready to take pictures of the mangled bodies, etc.

Bishop Duncan, now deposed, is none the less in the employ of the Diocese as a consultant. Saturday looks like a fine day for consulting and for post-Convention interviews. If the vote goes for separation, his role will rapidly change again, no matter that he has been deposed. In Anglican Land deposition of a bishop means something, but not too much. The deposed Bishop of Recife still gets a place to be bishop, even if not invited to Lambeth. The deposed Bishop of Pittsburgh still has Anglican Communion friends who insist they will recognize him as bishop. So which ever ways it goes on Saturday he has a place to hang his miter.

The anticipation is that these events are high points in some struggle for the cause of salvation. The fact on the ground will be less glamorous. The events will be made into ground meat and the blood spilt will transmogrify into sauce, and everyone will tell us how much better everything tastes.

In America Land, generally speaking, no one cares who is for Vice, only who is automatically the next President in the event of the need. It is the matter of being the heir that is the problem.


In Anglican Land, generally speaking, what happens to the Bishop of Pittsburgh is of little consequence. Bishops come and go. But in this case it seems that the claim is being made that the Bishop of Pittsburgh is the face of Anglicanism in North America and heir to the mantle of Primate-like authority in these parts.

The denouement is always about inheritance: we reap what we sow.


These are unpleasant times and tonight and Saturday will give me a headache. Fortunately we are being visited by a being of another order...the lady Lily, who while visiting St. Peter's (where I am allowed to work) immediately picked up a prayer book in Church and sat muttering to herself. A born Anglican and a truly intelligent woman.





Anglican, intelligent... wonderful. Maybe there is hope. Life is more than ground meat and remainder. By the time the debate is on she will be asleep. On Saturday she will be busy as well. Life goes on.



Bishop Iker's Reasoning

Bishop Iker’s 10 Reasons to “Realign” have been published. The Pluralist has spoken on Bishop Iker's comments HERE. (The Pluralist produced this picture to the left.)

Here are Bishop Iker's Comments, abbreviated, with commentary.


1. This is God’s time – our kairos moment – and it has been coming for a long time…

Glad to see that Bishop Iker has a handle on God’s time. But wait…how do we know? The Bishop may be (and I think is) wrong. Great identification with God's time and "our" time. Just a tad arrogant, don't you think?

2. Actions of the General Convention have brought crisis and division to the whole Anglican Communion, not just TEC. … We need to dissociate ourselves from the bishops and dioceses that are violating the teaching of Scripture...

Dissociation is not the same as leaving. Still, it can be. If one feels that way, one might leave. Point taken.

3. The heresies and heterodoxy once proclaimed by just a few renegade bishops – like James Pike and John Spong – are now echoed by the Presiding Bishop… The greatest problem we face with Katharine Jefferts Schori is not that she is a woman, but that she is not an orthodox bishop.

Well, Bishop Iker, you protest too much. The greatest problem for you, given your years of witness, is that she is a woman.

As to the Presiding Bishop being orthodox, explain to me how your position, having been ordained in this church under the so called new prayer book and with the Constitution and Canons in place, is not as heterodox as you claim she is, or alternately that she is not as orthodox as you are. The Pluralist speaks to this.

4. If we do not act now, we will lose our momentum and lose our God-given opportunity. …We will never be stronger than we are right now! We will never have another chance to act with such a strong majority. …

Right. Act now, because matters are slipping out of your hands. This tactic is very much like starting a war now on the grounds that you will never again have as much support as you do now. Reminds me of, well, never mind….

5. TEC is not turning back and matters will only get worse. … By the time I retire (in the next 7 to 13 years), this diocese will be unable to elect an orthodox bishop to succeed me.

This is really, really, really, a bad reason. Do it now or else you won’t be able to elect an orthodox bishop, meaning one that will not ordain women. What a mess of pottage.

6. TEC is coming after us…

So we better run?

7. At this time there is nothing in the Constitution or Canons of TEC that prevents a Diocese from leaving. … So we have this window of opportunity to do what we need to do, for you can be sure that the next General Convention will close off this option by adopting amendments that will make it even more difficult to separate in the future.

There is nothing that prevents people from leaving. The organization of a diocese (no the people, but the church entity) is a matter for the Church to deal with. If you leave you can go where you are received, be a diocese through them, do what you want. But you can’t be the Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth. What you want to do, and the only reason for leaving quickly, is to get out with the property before anyone can figure out how to make it the property of whatever the Episcopal Church entity is.

And BTW, the Constitution and Canons seem to point to the possibility of a mutual separation, and makes no provision otherwise. Have you ever asked General Convention for a joint decision to leave? I thought not.

8. The vast majority of our younger clergy, those ordained in the last 10 years or so, are in favor of the decision to separate and realign…

And who ordained them? I remember. You.

9. We have international support for making the move at this time. …We will then aggressively pursue the formation of an orthodox Province in North America in conjunction with the Common Cause Partnership.

Ah…now it comes: The reason to realign is that there is a place to go and things to do. With realignment comes the possibility of being part of the “true” Anglican Church in North America. Good point. Go where you want to go, be what you want to be. But the gamble is real and the stakes are high. If you are wrong you will be another splinter group claiming to be the true church. Go.

10. Most importantly, this decision is about the truth of the Gospel and upholding the authority of the Holy Scriptures. We believe in God’s full self-revelation in Jesus Christ, not in the speculation of humanist unitarians who have been elected to high offices in our church. Many leaders of TEC are teaching a false Gospel and leading people astray. Now is the time for us to take a bold, public stand for the biblical faith and practice of the one, holy, catholic and apostolic church.

I couldn’t help leaving this one complete. It is audacious, libelous and just plain arrogant.

Bishop Iker has ten reasons for realignment. But really he has one reason to leave the Episcopal Church and he wants everyone else to buy in: He hates the Episcopal Church.

Fine. Go. And those who are convinced that he is right, go with him. Leave the keys. There are others who still love this Church.

On his way out I bet he will not think to ask if being ordained bishop in this speculative humanist Unitarian false Gospel means he himself is so tainted that he is not actually a bishop at all. But if so he would be a false shepherd.

I think the Episcopal Church did something wrong. It affirmed and ordained as bishop someone whose hatred for the Church knows no bounds.

Bishop Iker has left, only his shadow remains. Time to turn on the lights.