tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10326675.post1220677675713036127..comments2024-02-15T03:32:25.686-05:00Comments on Preludium, Anglican and Episcopal futures: The Working Party on Theological Education in the Anglican Communion speaks... or perhaps mumbles.Mark Harrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06871096746243771489noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10326675.post-37415842360947960532012-03-19T13:40:15.194-04:002012-03-19T13:40:15.194-04:00John 2007
Again, I note the 'swithcing of jer...John 2007<br /><br />Again, I note the 'swithcing of jerseys' so to speak. Fr Mark, many times, claimed things were 'un-Anglican,' didn't folllow the Anglican way or methos, were not part of our polity expressed down through history (funny how polity is assumed to be unchanging), and not bristles at some suggestion for the nature of Anglican Identity, and hardly an aggressive one at that.<br /><br />What does this change mean? No Anglican identity? No Anglican tendencies even?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10326675.post-64728649798990983442012-03-18T08:26:40.382-04:002012-03-18T08:26:40.382-04:00I agree with you, Fr. Mark. No worldwide Anglican...I agree with you, Fr. Mark. No worldwide Anglican Church. As I read the statement of an "Anglican Way," I was puzzled and wondered, "When did this happen?" Perhaps it happened when this TEAC got together for some wine and cheese before heading off to Sri Lanka!SCGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08162762233972733978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10326675.post-71855085666971212192012-03-16T15:00:05.262-04:002012-03-16T15:00:05.262-04:00John 2007 writes...
Am I reading Preludium?
A ...John 2007 writes...<br /><br />Am I reading Preludium? <br /><br />A fair number of post here in the past have made very clear claims for The Anglican way of doing and not doing things and articulated normative aspects of Anglican identity. <br /><br />(And for the record Hooker so elevated, and assumed, the centrality and authority of Scripture in its major sense and revelation that any 3 legged stool with it wd be impossible to sit on!)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10326675.post-8150537103202520252012-03-14T13:28:57.708-04:002012-03-14T13:28:57.708-04:00Cast in stone - the way the Instruments of Communi...Cast in stone - the way the Instruments of Communion (Unity) are mentioned in a white paper one day and someone has redesigned the AC website to incorporate them the next?Brother Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333089314994730330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10326675.post-32115702499174165242012-03-14T10:48:15.153-04:002012-03-14T10:48:15.153-04:00All this being formed, shaped, etc. is passive voi...All this being formed, shaped, etc. is passive voice. The ideal disciple is a passive recipient, it seems.Mark Diebelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17197749527182706761noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10326675.post-61022875389881277872012-03-14T07:43:16.762-04:002012-03-14T07:43:16.762-04:00Well I hope your directive is also aimed at bromid...Well I hope your directive is also aimed at bromides like 'scripture, reason and tradition' is the Anglican Way. There's a chestnut. Find any anglican who appeals to it as if Hooker set it forth for that purpose, until the mid-20th century (at which time Reason meant something vastly different than in Hooker's day). I thought the fourfold pattern better captured Hooker than proponents of his cord of three strands, in which to scripture is the highest honor due.<br /><br />MsgrMsgrnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10326675.post-82665950546297428922012-03-14T06:47:29.630-04:002012-03-14T06:47:29.630-04:00I'm with you, Mark. No world wide Church writ ...I'm with you, Mark. No world wide Church writ large. And what Lionel said. I have nothing to add to the conversation. I just want to stand up and be counted.Lois Keenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13708877817422097051noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10326675.post-22660526303339608962012-03-13T23:30:53.914-04:002012-03-13T23:30:53.914-04:00Is it not about time to acknowledge that almost no...Is it not about time to acknowledge that almost none of the bureaucracy of the Anglican Communion, including its myriad committees, groups, commissions, conferences, councils, or what have you, is actually useful in the sense of either unifying its component churches or advancing any recognizably Christian mission?Lionel Deimelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08363018512775944659noreply@blogger.com