tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10326675.post2285534730318953163..comments2024-02-15T03:32:25.686-05:00Comments on Preludium, Anglican and Episcopal futures: One Hundred Years: Enough? Talk of autonomy continues... (Part 2 of series on Haiti)Mark Harrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06871096746243771489noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10326675.post-38345701235258201272016-07-26T10:02:44.585-04:002016-07-26T10:02:44.585-04:00Interesting, Mark. It would seem to me, too, that ...Interesting, Mark. It would seem to me, too, that Haiti has more than one option. (Note: this is just a thought experiment, as it were. I do agree that any choice needs to be a Haitian decision.) What would it look like if:<br />- Haiti were to be a separate national church in the Communion?<br />- Haiti continued in the Episcopal Church, but participated in Province IX instead of Province II?<br />- Haiti determined to be a diocese of the Province of the West Indies, or of IARCA?<br /><br />I live in an area (impacting two dioceses), and actually serve in an institution, where there is strong support for specific institutions in the Diocese of Haiti. While accountability is an issue, I am not seeing any flagging of concern or enthusiasm for those ministries. I can't imagine that the concern or enthusiasm would be adversely affected by a decision of Haitian Episcopalians to change status relative to the General Convention.Marshall Scotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02807749717320495495noreply@blogger.com