The Network makes Claims.

The Network of Anglican Communion Dioceses and Parishes – the legal name for the Anglican Communion Network – is going through some interesting changes. (I never refer to it as the Anglican Communion Network since that gives undue credibility to the organization, as if it were indeed a Network OF the Anglican Communion, rather than a network IN the Anglican Communion.)

The Network has a new web page look, crisper and cleaner without heraldry beyond its logo (which looks strangely like the Anglican Communion compass rose logo.) The site’s front page no longer directly links the reader to the American Anglican Council. The Moderator is no longer as prominent. The site front page links to the News Archive, the place where the lead articles find a home. There is very little to suggest that this is anything but an organization of concerned Episcopalians and Anglicans, concerned to be Anglican and orthodox.

All of this follows the path laid out by the AAC and the Network about just how to divide the tasks of realignment. The AAC would take the harder tact, being critical of the Episcopal Church and its leadership in the more harsh terms. The Network would work from ‘within’ as an organization clearly within the Episcopal Church working for its renewal and repentance.

So it is with some interest that the last several lead articles on the Network web pages remind us of the fact that there continues to be an interlacing of the efforts to work for realignment.

The Network proclaimed on January 23, 2006, “The ACN, which was formed just two years ago, continues to grow daily. Presently, affiliates include over 1000 parishes and 2500 clergy, 10 dioceses and 6 convocations, and an estimated 250,000 communicants.” The 10 dioceses and 6 convocations is now inclusive of the Forward in Faith congregations, and so the count of 1000 parishes may be a reasonable guess (remembering the Network states that not all parishes openly declare themselves as part of the Network.) At the same time not all parishes in the 10 dioceses wish to be included in the count, and not all parishes included continue to be related. More, we have very little to test the extent to which these parishes look to the Moderator for ecclesial or spiritual leadership. In any event, there are 8032 parishes listed with Church Publishing Clergy Directory and so the number 1000 is a bit high. One tenth of the dioceses ought to yield about one tenth of the parishes, or about 800.

As for the numbers of 2,500 clergy and 250,000 communicants, these numbers are more difficult to understand. The Network, even assuming everyone in all ten dioceses and a considerable following elsewhere, is suggesting that one in five clergy and one in five communicants are members of the Network. We will never know, of course, because the Network does not list all parishes, and no communicants for a variety of reasons.

Interestingly, over 14 months ago, October, 2004, the Network claimed 800 parishes and 1000 clergy. So, there have been 200 more parishes counted, but 1,500 more clergy claimed. If so, the Network claim to growth has not been in Dioceses (unchanged) or in parishes (moderate growth) but in clergy and lay persons. We will see.

Having claimed new growth, the Network, through its Moderator announced that all the Forward in Faith North America parishes (in the US) have become Network parishes. This makes the Forward in Faith convocation much larger.

The last of the announcements, made February 15th, is that the Network will form a seventh convocation to be made up of parishes that have affiliated to dioceses elsewhere in the world. The story states, “They are now under the jurisdiction of dioceses in four Anglican Provinces: Uganda, Southern Cone, Kenya and Central Africa.” The Network seems to be consolidating parts of the wider “Common Cause Partners” into itself.

The object of all this is to make a strong claim for attention prior to General Convention. If between now and then the Network draws in additional partners, say AMiA, or solidifies its relation to the Global South Anglican initiative, and particularly with the Province of Nigeria, the Network’s claim to attention grows.

In terms of its international standing, the Network needs the Province of Nigeria. Nigeria now has parishes in the United States, and has entered covenants with the Reformed Episcopal Church and the Anglican Province of America. However, the Archbishop of Nigeria has come out in support of Nigerian law criminalizing homosexual behavior and any organization or gatherings in support of homosexuals. The Archbishop is a growing embarrassment and too close a connection with him will become more and more a mixed blessing.

The plan is on course… consolidate, let the AAC do the nasty work, find partners where you can. But there is still time for things to go sour. Perhaps the numbers are a bit overblown, perhaps the union of those who can’t bear women in ordained ministry, those who can’t bear women bishops and those who can won’t hold, perhaps bishops from the Global South will find the connections with the Network less interesting if they seem themselves loosing these parishes, and perhaps, God willing, the Moderator will see fit to distance himself and the Network from the Archbishop’s stand on criminalization of homosexuals in Nigeria.

But about distancing from the Archbishop of Nigeria and his support of criminalization nothing has been heard. No announcement yet.


  1. Nigeria now has parishes in the United States, and has entered covenants with the Reformed Church of America and the Anglican Province of America.

    Don't you mean the Reformed Episcopal Church, Mark? (the 19th c. Episcopal splinter, as opposed to the more mainline of the two Dutch Calvinist denominations, the RCA?)

    I admit I find this all rather depressing: can there really be 1000 Episcopal parishes that buy into the Network's {pardon my . . . perception of the Truth} load of idolatrous cr*p? :-(


    It may be, that the Episcopal Church (w/ a few allies around the world) may have to be the "faithful remnant" of Anglicanism, for a generation or longer (I hope that in my twilight years---I'm 44---I may yet see a worldwide Anglican Communion worthy of the name...)

  2. J.C. Fisher is on the case. Arrrrrg...it is the Reformed Episcopal Church. I just corrected the essay. Thanks.

    I have spent almost 40 years in ordained ministry (wow, you make me feel old) much of that in supporting Anglicanism and the AC. I think these are possibly the most exciting times for the AC yet, but the crazies do make life difficult. Still, for the first time in ages lots of folk are paying attention to the life of the Communion.

    Nothing like an stratch to make for an itch.


  3. Mark,

    Thank you for your ongoing reflections on the various tactics and machinations of the AAC, Network, et al. It is hard to get my mind around at many points, and I continually wonder whether these actions are really what Jesus asks us to do when he says "take up my cross and follow me"!

    Another observation I have in much of this is the sense of triumphalism (on the AAC page, for instance) at the breaking up and tearing apart of some parishes and diocese. No matter what your perspective, I really question whether Christ is relishing all of these actions and is raising his hands in victory!

    I think back to your reflections on the waves hitting the shore near your home, and the ever-present prevenient Grace of God...

    May God's wisdom prevail over these many squabbles!


    Peter Carey, Alexandria VA

  4. What in the world is a stratch? Don't know. But a scratch is more or less what I meant.

  5. Mark - I wonder if some of the numbers that the Network claim include parishes from outside the Episcopal Church? I'm thinking specifically of whether or not it includes the Reformed Episcopal Church and the numerous Continuing Anglican splinter groups.

    I believe that the Network considers those entities to be fully part of their organization - even if they aren't recognized by most of the rest of the Anglican Communion.

    That might explain the significant boost in clergy numbers as well.

  6. One of the modes of action typical in such efforts at manipulation (and let's be clear that this is what it is) is the "good cop" "bad cop" approach. Beware when either the rhetoric gets so high and ranting it appears ridiculous -- and equally wary when sweet reason seems to prevail. This group with two faces wants nothing other than the complete control of The Episcopal Church. They have made that clear from the outset in their charter -- relying on the Constitution of the church under their peculiar interpretation.

    Thank you, Mark, for being a watchman on the bulwarks. Do not let up for a moment, and neither will I.

    All blessings,

  7. This is situation is being studied as an ecumenical phenomenon. Three demoninations are under attack by the same group, the IRD, and have been since the 1980s. I invite all of you to read http//www.talk2action as well as your website here. We need to work in community with all mainline churches suffering under this burden. Finally there is open coordinated conversation about the situation

  8. ooops! Add an .org to the end of that website. It's late and I am a little forgetful.


OK... Comments, gripes, etc welcomed, but with comment moderation but with some cautions and one rule:
Cautions: Calling people fools, idiots, etc, will be reason to bounce your comment. Keeping in mind that in the struggles it is difficult enough to try to respect opponents, we should at least try.