12/14/2006

The Heavy Hand of Uganda Weighs In

Just posted over on TitusOneNine (thanks) is the following: A Pastoral Letter from the Archbishop of the Church of Uganda It has no date attached, but was posted at 4:59 PM December 14, 2006.

In it the Archbishop reiterates much of what he has said before, but with singular force he directs all of his bishops concerning any relationship with the Episcopal Church, and in particular with bishops and clergy who have voted for, coluded in, or other wise associated with people advocating the election or consecration of a gay or lesbian person as bishop, or anyone who thinks that The Presiding Bishop is a reasonable person of faith expressing views that are not heretical.

What we have here is the equivalent of the proposed Nigerian law outlawing all forms of engagement with the support for gay and lesbian persons.

Read it and weep.

Here is the crux of the matter:

“I have been in consultation with the other Primates and Archbishops of Africa and the Global South about this crisis in our beloved Anglican Communion. We have written to the Archbishop of Canterbury and informed him that we cannot sit together with Katharine Jefferts Schori at the upcoming Primates Meeting in February. We have also asked the Archbishop of Canterbury to invite an orthodox Bishop from the Anglican Communion Network in America to attend the Primates Meeting and represent the orthodox believers. We await his decision on these matters.”

The Kigali Communiqué stated, “At the next meeting of the Primates in February 2007 some of us will not be able to recognize Katharine Jefferts Schori as a Primate at the table with us. Others will be in impaired communion with her as a representative of The Episcopal Church. Since she cannot represent those dioceses and congregations who are abiding by the teaching of the Communion we propose that another bishop, chosen by these dioceses, be present at the meeting so that we might listen to their voices during our deliberations.”

The statement, “some of us will not be able to recognize Katharine Jefferts Schori,” now becomes “we cannot sit together with Katharine Jefferts Schori.” I note, with distress the seeming inability of these communiqués to address her as Presiding Bishop, or even Bishop. But the main issue, of course, is that the matter of recognition is now a matter of even sitting at the table.

The second notion, that “orthodox Bishop from the Anglican Communion Network in America to attend,” reflects the work done in November in Washington. There those American bishops meeting with the Global South Steering Committee are reported to have agreed that Bishop Duncan would be their spokesperson. So now, instead of “we propose that another bishop, chosen by these dioceses, be present at the meeting so that we might listen to their voices during our deliberations,” we now have this: “We have also asked the Archbishop of Canterbury to invite an orthodox Bishop from the Anglican Communion Network in America.”

So here we are: Hard ball pitched from Uganda. “We won’t sit at the same table with KJS and we want an ACN Bishop (read the Moderator.)

Time to call the game on account of a wild pitch.

This is an outrageous development and the Archbishop of Canterbury ought to have nothing to do with it.

If there is a meeting of the Primates (and I recommend that there not be one, or at least not in Tanzania) it has to be of ALL the Primates, and that includes Presiding Bishop and Primate Katharine Jefferts Schori – and no one else.

24 comments:

  1. Bill Carroll14/12/06 6:59 PM

    It's high time for Canterbury to give these folks a clear "no." The Bishop of Pittsburgh cannot be permitted to attend, not even as an observer. He has not been elected to any ecclesial office, except that of diocesan bishop. Canterbury must insist that the meeting include all primates and presdiding bishops and no one else.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The timing of the CofE evangelicals "covenant statement" putting internal pressure on Archbishop Williams seems less than coincidental in light of this missive from Uganda. Looks like a one-two punch to me. Will it knock out Canterbury for good, or finally knock some sense into him?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The 'purple shirts' of the Global South are showing their true colors: hate-filled people, gay-bashing and misogynistic. Why give them a stage on which publicly before the secular world to act out their four-year-old temper tantrums and bring shame on Christians world-wide?

    ++Rowan Cantuar would be well advised to cancel both the February 2007 Primates' Meeting and the 2008 Lambeth Conference, until such time as saner heads emerge in the Anglican Communion.

    John Henry

    ReplyDelete
  4. The game is up. It's clear the ACN and their allies overseas are ready to try pushing the Episcopal Church out by isolating ++Katharine and otherwise do violence to the Primates meeting and the greater Communion.

    There are no kind or Christian words I can write beyond that. May ++Rowan at last stand up to this shameless behavior.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The game is up, that's for certain.

    Actions have concequences, whether or not you view the new thing as prophetic.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Last time I checked TEC was still out of the Anglican Consultative Council. Hello? What is it going to take for TEC to wake and realize - it's a crisis! Hello? Hello?

    bb

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yep, the religious right/political hate caper club is fully "explosed" and the "jig is up"...it's been "up" and over-the-top for quite a long time now anyway with righteous arrogance and defiance running rampant from some of the usual/disrespectful Southern gents and their Global Southland gang pals...the big change today is that no longer will unholy bigots in purple shirts and their very sick selfrighteous "talking down" to everyone buddies/accomplices be able to secretly hang other Christians out to dry/die on rotted tree limbs.

    Shortly after finding a "place to stand" they've mobbed together and actively planted burning crosses ignited with fear and hate against LGBT Christians at various locations within the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion. It is no longer a puritan planned secret known only to themselves as to how to "seekout and destroy" fellow Christian human beings...the world can now see with STARK clarity what form the fear, loathing and hatred has taken into being a reality at the Anglican Communion.

    Our desire for inclusiveness at all levels of Church life for Heterosexual Women and LGBT Christians has always been specifically about loving God, one another and being of service to others at OUR Anglican Communion and beyond.

    Nothing less will we settle for and we want nothing more than being the actual people that God has made us to be amongst OUR own families at the Body of Christ.

    God doesn't want or expect less from people like us no matter *others* may think.

    We've accepted the "challenge" to become the "open" kind of Christians that God insists that we were born to be.

    ReplyDelete
  8. BabyBlue said..."Last time I checked TEC was still out of the Anglican Consultative Council."

    Maybe you had better check again. TEC is a member of the ACC and it takes a change of its Constitution to change that fact. TEC *voluntarially* chose not to participate in a meeting. TEC did not resign its membership.

    As much as your faction would like to have TEC already kicked out, it has not yet happened.

    ReplyDelete
  9. One thinks you need an interpretation to what 'invited' actually means in British. We're a polite lot you know.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Gosh, it's too bad Uganda won't be there.

    Isn't it.

    Well, nobody can force them.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "What is it going to take for TEC to wake and realize - it's a crisis! Hello? Hello?" BB

    What crisis? This is just more mumbojumbo hate crime inspiring junktalk BB. You might view it differently if you were used to being demonized, marginalized and despised in everyday life.

    Self-loathing and self-destructive acting-out don't count of course...the loathing has to come from a "outside" source.

    ReplyDelete
  12. DF in Massachusetts14/12/06 10:16 PM

    I think Rowan Williams may wind up drinking more this Christmas than the Bishop of Southwark recently consumed at the Irish Embassy party.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The good news is that one of the a-historic "Instruments of Unity" has self-destructed in just under three years. If this Primates' Meeting is canceled, it is unlikely there will ever be another.

    However, though canceling the February Primates' Meeting is the least dishonorable course ++Rowan could take, I fully expect him to cave. Like the mediocre kindergarten teacher he should have been, he will throw all his energies into placating whichever child is throwing the loudest and most spectacular tantrum.

    Lord Carey was right to want to keep Rowan Williams out of England -- though for all the wrong reasons.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Surprise! Surprise! For three plus years, TEC and Canterbury have been repeatedly told the probable consequences of the innovations being brokered into the church by a hard core radical left wing lobby. So the chickens are coming home to roost and all of you are shocked. It is still not too late. Acquiesce in real alternate oversight and the creation of a tenth province and perhaps, someday, a healing of the rift may take place. Persist in your stubborn pride, and watch it go to pieces around you. Choose this day indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Shocked? who's shocked here? Please. And by now few of us will be shocked by Rowan Williams's response whatever it may be -- frankly, I think most of the posters here and on the other "liberal" boards will be more surprised if Rowan stands up to Orombi than if we caves.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Surprise, surprise?

    No one who has read the Chapman Memo is even slightly surprised by the latest antics of the schismatic fundamentalists.

    They laid out their conspiracy in writing for the world to see and have followed it to the letter.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "So the chickens are coming home to roost and all of you are shocked. It is still not too late. Acquiesce in real alternate oversight and the creation of a tenth province and perhaps, someday, a healing of the rift may take place. Persist in your stubborn pride, and watch it go to pieces around you. Choose this day indeed!" Chicken Non

    BLAME, SHAME, more BLAME, SHAME and silly greed...after 2000 years of quacking you'd think you'd develope some common and spiritually healthy/loving principles and sense of religious community with ALL of your brothers and sisters at the Body of Christ!

    Squaking is not the sound of "chickens coming home to roost" but the ancient cry of puritan quacks as it's their turn to be called "chicken" and face the END of their hate-mongering soul-plucking campaign.

    Dancing on the graves of LGBT Christians, moderate and Via Media thinkers who don't agree with your ugly and fear driven demogory is getting your old GOAT as the rooster enters the hen yard!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Let's all remember that this is the season of miricles!! God has done wonderous things in past mid-winters. Maybe this year he will grow Rowan a spine.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Well, Brant Wiley, he might have done.

    http://www.anglicancommunion.org/acns/articles/42/25/acns4229.cfm

    ACNS 4229 | ACO | 15 DECEMBER 2006

    From the Secretary General of the Anglican Communion

    'In response to a number of queries, and following consultation with The Archbishop of Canterbury, the Secretary General of the Anglican Communion has issued the following statement:

    "The Convocation of Anglicans in North America (CANA) is, to my knowledge, a "mission" of the Church of Nigeria. It is not a branch of the Anglican Communion as such but an organsation which relates to a single province of the Anglican Communion. CANA has not petitioned the Anglican Consultative Council for any official status within the Communion's structures, nor has the Archbishop of Canterbury indicated any support for its establishment." '

    The Revd Canon Kenneth Kearon

    So the Archbishop of Uganda may refuse to recognize Presiding Bishop Katharine and TEC if he wishes (and who could stop him), but no separate ecclesial structure in North America exists for him to recognize in TEC's place.

    CANA's Communion status is no different from AMiA's.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Don't forget those heavy handed Scots:

    Church Rejects Proposal on Same Sex Blessings

    The Church of Scotland has voted overwhelmingly against a proposed church law to allow ministers and deacons to conduct services of blessing in conjunction with civil partnership ceremonies.

    The General Assembly in May 2006 decided to consult the church‟s presbyteries on whether to give permission to conduct such services. The proposal would have needed a majority of the Kirk‟s 45 voting presbyteries to be accepted.

    The final results of this vote are that 9 presbyteries voted for the proposal, while 36 voted against.

    ReplyDelete
  21. The Church of Scotland is not Anglican.

    They are Calvinists, just like our own schismatics.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Bill Carroll16/12/06 8:56 AM

    This is hardly something that has been pushed by a radical left wing. It is a pastoral response to the needs of same sex couples, who are already members of the Church. The politics of many Anglican evangelicals are left of center in most respects. But that's beside the point. But we are a comprehensive, i.e. Catholic, Church, trying to comprehend, i.e. include, the people God has put us in communion with. The real issue here is whether God is the God of all creation, or just the "straight" parts. This is why the anti-gay position is heresy. It is a denial of the doctrine of creation, of human kind as imago dei, and of the catholicity of the Church.

    The catholicity of the Church is an eschatological reality. It has never yet been achieved, but full inclusion of lgbtq people is a step toward catholicity, just as the inclusion of the Gentiles was. It is for this reason that there is no turning back. Issues of inclusion unmask a false understanding of the Gospel that has been running rampant in the Church for thousands of years. One could say something similar with regard to the unfinished feminist revolution. It exposes similar heresies in the tradition.

    Make no mistake, though, the Episcopal Church is viscerally conservative. The movement toward full inclusion would have no traction at all unless it appealed to people with pretty conventional faith, grounded in the Scriptures and the Creeds. I count myself in this group. I am thoroughly orthodox, although I prefer not to use the word anymore, because of the abuses that the right wing is making of the term. Orthodox Christians are all "revisionists," liKe Jesus and Paul. Our foundational documents are inherently subversive. True orthodoxy leads us to comprehensiveness. It frames a radical Gospel, which opens us to ongoing conversion, i.e. revision. The Truth for Christians is a person, not a static set of propositions. The Creeds and the Biblical story are meant to point us to this Person, Jesus Christ, the Alpha and Omega, fully divine and fully human, the crucified and risen One. They are not meant to freeze us in the sixteenth or nineteenth century. The Church has always struggled forward, toward full Catholicity and a more adequate confession of the one God who creates and redeems us all.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Well, one might have thought that this "Instrument of Unity" (BTW, I far preferred the earlier descritopn "Instrument of Communion") was already in trouble when at the last Primates' Meeting in Dromantine about half the members refused to receive Communion (I don't have the exact list at have -- basically Africa minus South Africa & Southeast Asia) -- the coming schism will probably fall along those lines.

    And I very much concur with Bill Carroll's last post. TEC got to its current positions on issues by confronting the Gospel & submitting to its claims.

    ReplyDelete
  24. One thinks you need an interpretation to what 'invited' actually means in British. We're a polite lot you know.

    Well, Peter, so was Pilate (very gracious w/ that "King of the Jews" sign, wouldn't you say?)

    *****

    Bill Carroll: Amen, Amen and Amen! :-D

    ReplyDelete

OK... Comments, gripes, etc welcomed, but with comment moderation but with some cautions and one rule:
Cautions: Calling people fools, idiots, etc, will be reason to bounce your comment. Keeping in mind that in the struggles it is difficult enough to try to respect opponents, we should at least try.
Rule: PLEASE DO NOT SIGN OFF AS ANONYMOUS: BEGIN OR END THE MESSAGE WITH A NAME - ANY NAME. ANONYMOUS commentary will be cut.