11/24/2007

Taking the Anglican Communion seriously, one encounter at a time.

Little noticed on the blogs in the past week is the continuing and quite extraordinary travels of the Presiding Bishop. In her latest trip she engaged the post-denominational church in China, an ecumenical range of churches in Korea, Anglicans from throughout the Communion concerned with the mission of peace, and the small Episcopal Church community on Guam.

This year she has visited Anglicans worldwide: she has visited them at least Tanzania, Cuba, South Africa, Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil, Puerto Rico, China, Korea and Guam. Several of these visits were to dioceses or missions of the Episcopal Church. Others were visits in conjunction with Anglican Communion meetings. They were all affirming the breadth of engagement by this church in the life and activities of the wider Communion.

The Anglican Communion is a fragile fellowship. It only exists to the extent that individuals, parishes, dioceses and churches purposefully take work at encounter, intersection, engagement, life together. For this reason, the Presiding Bishop's travels are an important part of both her ministry and the way by which the Episcopal Church makes known its commitment to the greater community.

Whatever the mess of the past ten years in Anglican-land, the awareness by members of the Episcopal Church of the Anglican Communion has expanded considerably. The implications of the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral regarding "the historic episcopate, locally adapted in the methods of its administration to the varying needs of the nations and peoples called by God into the unity of His Church" have become apparent. The principles of Mutual Responsibility and Interdependence in Christ (MRI) which were first raised at the Anglican Congress in Toronto in 1963 are now returning to challenge all Anglicans again.

It appears that the historic episcopate, locally adapted, means that churches in the Anglican Communion are not uniform in their understanding of the role of the episcopate in the ordering and discipline of church life. It appears that mutual responsibility and interdependence is not simply about a reordering of mission priorities, autonomy, and the "growing up" of the churches of the Anglican Communion but rather about actually getting together and doing something of the Lord's work together.

The hard work of affirming life together as a fellowship of churches requires more than uniformity and more than shared mission priorities. It requires a willingness to embrace a considerable ecclesial diversity, a desire to talk across that diversity to find common tasks in the service of God and the peoples of the world, and a preference for commensal relations.

The Episcopal Church, in a variety of ways, has committed itself to seeking ways to maintain this sort of fellowship - one that is diverse, missionary in focus, and commensal. The willingness and ability to share in a common sacramental life - to eat and talk at the same table - has been at the core of these visits.

The Anglican Communion is fragile enough that this basic activity has not always been possible with all she has visited - witness those Primate who would not receive communion with her in Tanzania. But in all the other visits of the year that commensal engagement was a major element in maintaining the bonds of affection that make the Anglican Communion possible.

The Archbishop of Canterbury recently asked the Primates to comment on the response of the Joint Standing Committee of the Primates and the Anglican Consultative Council to the House of Bishops' responses to questions posed by the Primates. ( The request is long link leading back to the demands - couched as requests - from the Windsor Report). Those responses have been posted and tell us not very much new.

Sevearl of the responses acknowledged that the Episcopal Church had taken time and engaged deeply in the issues of life in the Communion, at greater length and with greater depth than perhaps most other provinces. To that effort we might also note the extensive engagement in Communion wide activities related to matters of mission and justice - particularly the TEAM conference in South Africa and the Anglican Peace Conference "Towards Peace in Korea," and our continued attention to Anglican partners and Episcopal Church communities outside the United States.

Taking the Anglican Communion seriously is not only a matter of finding common ground, but taking the common ground we have seriously. To do that requires face to face encounter, engagement and commitment. The Presiding Bishop is doing her part. Let's do ours.

5 comments:

  1. "They were all affirming the breath of engagement..."

    Not to be too picky, but did you intent that to be "breadth"? If so, I think it gives the whole post a whole 'nother meaning, as we say where I used to live. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. susan s. Good eye. Corrected. M.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Whether I comment often or not, and I often feel inadequate to comment on your posts, I would like to thank you for your blog because I can almost always understand it. This has nothing to do with my understanding of all that is now going on in the Anglican Communion, and everything to do with how you take the time and space to actually spell out acronyms in words.

    My brain does not hold onto acronyms very well. For example every time I see a reference to SF(which i haven't seen very many of here) I automatically ask myself, "What has this to do with San Francisco?" And then the smack upside the head and a "Doh!" and I am back in the loop.:-)

    So thanks Mark, for your well thought out, well written, and mostly easily understood posts.

    Oh, and while we're at it, I see I misspelled 'intend' in my earlier comment. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you very much for posting this; it's some much-needed perspective.

    I do so agree with you that working together is the way to build relationships; work and prayer, Ora et Labora, are the things that build relationship.

    I had known that she was in various places - but hadn't known how many nor how far-flung. That's very good, and I hope we all can get involved, somehow, in keeping these relationships going. We ought to be able to, in this wired age. (I suggested on one of the Episcopal Church surveys that we ought to have a website for the very purpose of communicating with others in the Communion no matter how far away. I hope that will happen someday.)

    Thanks again for letting us know about this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mark... it's ColOmbia. Two Os.

    ReplyDelete

OK... Comments, gripes, etc welcomed, but with comment moderation but with some cautions and one rule:
Cautions: Calling people fools, idiots, etc, will be reason to bounce your comment. Keeping in mind that in the struggles it is difficult enough to try to respect opponents, we should at least try.
Rule: PLEASE DO NOT SIGN OFF AS ANONYMOUS: BEGIN OR END THE MESSAGE WITH A NAME - ANY NAME. ANONYMOUS commentary will be cut.