From The Episcopal News Service, COO asks church to engage in 'structural reform' conversations to shift focus toward mission. Much of what I suggested on my blog entry, "Is it time for a Special General Convention? is in this proposal. The difference of course is Bishop Sauls gave a concise presentation of the idea and he is Chief Operating Officer, not some itinerant blogger. And no, I had no idea that the idea was out there being considered by anyone else. Perhaps it is time.
Here is the ENS article:
[Episcopal News Service – Quito, Ecuador]
The Episcopal Church's chief operating officer has asked the House
of Bishops to engage the laity and clergy in their dioceses in
conversation in support of a potential structural reform that he said
could shift the church's focus toward mission.
The Rt. Rev Stacy Sauls on Sept. 20 offered the bishops a "model"
resolution for each diocese to submit to the 77th General Convention in
2012 for consideration.
"We find ourselves at an adaptive moment in the time of the church,
if we choose to take it," said Sauls at the start of a presentation
titled "Becoming a Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society: An Adaptive
Moment."
Sauls gave his presentation during the Sept. 20 morning session of
the Episcopal Church's House of Bishops Sept. 15-20 meeting being held
at the Hilton Colón Hotel in downtown Quito.
The model resolution would call for a special commission to be
charged with "presenting a plan to the church for reforming its
structures, governance, administration, and staff to facilitate this
church's faithful engagement in Christ's mission…."
Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori and House of Deputies President Bonnie Anderson would appoint members to the special commission. The resolution would also call for a special meeting of General Convention before the 78th General Convention in 2015.
Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori and House of Deputies President Bonnie Anderson would appoint members to the special commission. The resolution would also call for a special meeting of General Convention before the 78th General Convention in 2015.
The resolution, Saul said, could be distributed at upcoming diocesan conventions or in committees to start the conversation.
"This is a way of engaging the laity and clergy on the ground, not a
bishop-centric thing," Sauls told ENS after his presentation. "We are
asking the laity and clergy to have this conversation."
Sauls' presentation, he explained, stemmed from conversations and discussions going back to the 2004 formation of the Budgetary Funding Task Force. It began with the question: "Why reform?" From there Sauls used eight separate slides to list the church's 75 commissions, committees, agencies and boards -- those he could readily identify, he said -- and another five slides to list the 46 Episcopal Church Center departments and offices, all of which have multiple reporting structures.
Sauls' presentation, he explained, stemmed from conversations and discussions going back to the 2004 formation of the Budgetary Funding Task Force. It began with the question: "Why reform?" From there Sauls used eight separate slides to list the church's 75 commissions, committees, agencies and boards -- those he could readily identify, he said -- and another five slides to list the 46 Episcopal Church Center departments and offices, all of which have multiple reporting structures.
And then, he said, there is General Convention, which has 46
legislative committees of the two houses, which meet together in another
23 cognate committees; nine provinces; and 110 dioceses.
He then offered a pie-chart break down of budget resources by percentage:
- Mission – 53.2 percent
- Administration – 26.3 percent
- Other governance – 13 percent
- General Convention – 7.6 percent
Sauls' next slide showed how the income earned by dioceses has
declined in recent years. The Episcopal Church asks dioceses to
contribute a percentage of their income to the denomination's budget,
and thus revenue it receives from the dioceses has also declined.
That decline is coupled with a decision made
at the last meeting of General Convention (2009) to reduce the
percentage of the so-called "asking." It was 21 percent in 2010, dropped
to 20 percent this year and will decline another percentage point in
2012. In addition, the convention increased from $100,000 to $120,000
the amount that dioceses could exempt from their income before
calculating their commitment to the denomination.
As it stands in the current budget process, governance is funded
first, Sauls said, and then asked, "What would happen if we reversed
that priority, starting with mission?"
In order to get a good rating from the Better Business Bureau, a nonprofit organization should spend no more than 35 percent
of its budget on overhead, while the Episcopal Church, he said, spends
47 percent of its budget on such expenses. Ideally he added, the
percentage spent on overhead is closer to 15 to 20 percent.
Based on that, he continued, what if, in creating a hypothetical
annual budget of $27 million, $19 million of that budget went toward
mission and the remaining $8 million toward overhead? (The current budget is closer to $35 million, he said.)
Such a budget, he continued, could be funded by the church's
investment and rental income and by a one-percent contribution of
congregational income, based on full participation.
"One percent could fund mission and ministry at the church-wide level
and leave more [money] for local mission and ministry," Sauls said.
From there he offered four principles: engaging conversations aimed
at reducing overhead; redistributing oversight responsibilities based on
strengths; creating a linear rather than a top-down approach to
engagement; and emphasizing local participation.
Depending on how you look at it, he said, the fact that General
Convention takes 7.6 percent of the church's resources is a major or a
minor cost. Sauls went on to explain the estimated "total cost."
General Convention costs the church $8.3 million plus another
$353,000 to church center departments and $3.5 million to dioceses to
send its deputation and bishops -- a total of $12.2 million every three
years, not including the costs to individuals, he said.
Reducing the frequency of General Convention to every four years
would save 25 percent and every five years would save 40 percent, Sauls
continued, adding that the length and size of the meeting, how business
is presented and ongoing work also could be restructured to reduce
costs.
If given an extra $1 million dollars, the Church Center could deploy 40 additional appointed missionaries, or 85 Young Adult Service Corps
volunteers, Sauls said. And if the church center and the diocese split
the cost of a YASC volunteer 50/50, they could deploy 170 volunteers.
"We are entering a period of leveraging our resources through
partnership, but won't have resources to leverage unless we do things
differently," he said.
Sauls ended his presentation by offering a "faith statement" about the people of the Episcopal Church:
Sauls ended his presentation by offering a "faith statement" about the people of the Episcopal Church:
"The people of the Episcopal Church want to engage God's mission," he
said. "The people of the church want to participate in decisions about
engaging God's mission. The people of the church want to fund God's
mission."
Sauls then asked the bishops to talk at their tables about their own
definition of what mission means and practical suggestions for reform.
He also asked them to consider whether they would be willing to submit
the resolution to their dioceses for support.
Sauls is scheduled to address the church center staff on Sept. 22,
where he will begin a conversation with them on how they can begin to
take some risks and shape their future rather than have it shaped for
them, he said.
Sauls became the church's chief operating officer Sept. 1, succeeding Linda Watt, who retired in June.
Is Sauls paid out of the PB staff line?
ReplyDeleteHow is adminstration going to be cut from around 40% to much lower? Who is going to not draw a salary at 815?
Glad the skunk is on the table! Good news.
Franklin
My reflections http://telling-secrets.blogspot.com/2011/09/seed-of-jack-pine.html
ReplyDeleteThat's just the budget of the national church. I would like to see a combined budget of all dioceses, churches, and institutions. It would be interesting to see what the whole overhead of our operation is.
ReplyDeleteAnd I would like to see a "budget" like accounting of accomplishments. Then we might see how things could be improved.
Accomplishments: visit the prisoners, heal the sick, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, give water to the thirsty, rest to the weary, bless those who curse you, turn the other cheek, wash people's feet, care for the widows and orphans...
ReplyDeleteThis is a partial list of accomplishments. None of which bring in money. Nor are they supposed to.
...and lest someone thinks I left out "Preach the Good News", the list of accomplishments is the preaching of the Good News, for without the doing, the words are meaningless, and with the doing, the words are unnecessary.
ReplyDeleteMark,
ReplyDeleteGood posts on a special convention! One comment is that such a convention has only one item of business on the agenda, as in 1969 or 1823.
One salient statistic from Bp. Saul's presentation is that the present DFMS costs an average of 1.6% to each parish. He thinks it can be reduced to 1%. The diocese would also save a lot, and funds can be redirected to where they should first be spent, namely, the people of God.
It's not that God's church has a mission, but rather that God's mission has a church...
Yours in Christ,
Pierre Whalon