5/09/2014

The Episcopal Church and tendrals of connection with ACNA, some crushed.

The Episcopal Church has a long history of ecumenical engagement.  The Chicago - Lambeth Quadrilateral has been a major guide post in seeking reunion with other churches. The four guiding ideas in the Quadrilateral are: The Scriptures, the Creeds, The Sacraments of Baptism and Holy Communion, and the Episcopate.  

The actual working out of closer union has of course involved many other issues, some of them deeply grounded in history, particularly the history of stings and arrows.  Quite often the way forward to greater unity has been by ecumenical cooperation on issues and concerns unrelated to the basic disagreements existing between churches, and from there new friendships grow.

Now that The Anglican Church in North America is part of the ecumenical landscape - as a denomination in these United States - there is the beginning of ecumenical connection based on common concerns.

Several items this week point to this:

(i) The Institute for Religion and Democracy (not a church but a forceful advocate for particular church agendas), the Anglican Church in North America and The Episcopal Church, along with a number of other churches and religious organizations, through their leaders, signed on to a document related to concern for Christian minorities in the Middle East.  The Hudson Institute wrote this up noting that 

"Over 200 Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox leaders have signed on—from Catholic Cardinal Wuerl, to National Association of Evangelicals’ chair Leith Anderson, to Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori of the Episcopal Church, to Secretary General Rev. Dr. Susan Henry-Crowe of the United Methodists, to Armenian Orthodox Archbishop Oshagan Cholayan.

They include many lay civic society leaders, including Robert George of Princeton University, Jim Wallis of Sojourners, George Weigel of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, journalist Kirsten Powers, George Marlin, chair of Aid to the Church in Need-USA, and Lynne Hybels of Global Engagement of the Willow Creek Church."

The Living Church however picked out particularly the sign up of IRD, ACNA and TEC  leaders, interested in the fact that IRD and ACNA which have been in total opposition to TEC are signing a document along with the Presiding Bishop.  This is indeed interesting to note.

(ii) The Bishop of Los Angeles, Bishop Bruno, has issued a statement about the way forward for the Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Los Angeles. Among other things he states that All Saints, Long Beach, a congregation that had attempted to take diocesan assets (the church buildings) with them will continue on in those buildings under an agreement with the Diocese. The clarity of ownership has not meant a break in concern for those who had been part of The Episcopal Church and are now separate. Bishop Bruno writes, " "It is important that we remain in community, not in isolation, and that in charity we create space for people whose views may differ from our own. We are not here to judge one another but rather to be in joy with each other in the name of Jesus." 

All of this is to the good. There will be a wide variety of ways in which, although separated, members of The Episcopal Church and of the Anglican Church in North America will find common ground.

At the same time there seems to be no let up in the attacks by ACNA related organizations (in particular the American Anglican Council) on The Episcopal Church.  While there is considerable snarling about the moneys spent on litigation the consistent theme is the failure of TEC to continue what ACNA considers to be the fundamental truths of the faith. There is a lot of PB bashing. 

The Episcopal Church, while holding to the principal that properties in TEC are held in trust for the Episcopal Church, has been pretty careful not to slam ACNA as a church for its beliefs.  It has insisted that clergy who leave the Episcopal Church are no longer in orders, as far as TEC is concerned. The signals for this are that clergy are deposed.  Being deposed essentially means that the person so deposed looses any rights as a clergy person in TEC.  That does not seem to matter much to those so deposed, since the point is they have left TEC.  But it sounds pretty awful.

So there are rough edges, rough edges that make cooperative action difficult, for the stings and arrows are remembered.

Here in the little town on the Bay by the Big Water there are also signs of this common ground. In several local efforts TEC and ACNA people find themselves working for the good of the local community.

But here too there are rough edges.

We experienced one of those this last week.  Some parishioners came out from Church on Sunday morning to find a stapled set of pages tucked under their windshield wipers. The pages were essentially hate mail. It begins, "MY DEAR BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN CHRIST THE Episcopal Church you grew up in is not the same now. Un godly and unholy men and women who ar in charge have taken the Holy Bible and thrown it in the trash can. They say that only the homosexual clergy can understand the meaning, the bible is not the inspired word of GOD... " and goes on from there. (The quote is exactly as written, with odd phrasing and spelling.)

At the end of the first page it says, "Come out of the Episcopal church, Alternative King of King Dover."  

King of Kings, Dover, is a congregation a Diocese of the Anglican Church in North America, by way of Forward in Faith.  The bishops of this diocese, The Missionary Diocese of All Saints, are William H. Ilgenfritz and Richard W. Lipka.

The person delivering this hate mail may or may not have been doing this under parish direction or encouragement.  I would be saddened to discover that this had anything to do with the leadership of the diocese or supported by the local ACNA mission in Lewes.

Bishops Ilgenfritz and Lipka need to look into this.  These materials do not say the writer is from King of Kings, Dover, but reference it. The writer gives the number for the church - 335-3414. The voicemail on this number invited people to leave a message to the person or for King of Kings Anglican Church.  

If this is an effort by that church, the bishops should put a stop to it. If not then the writer, who seems a bit off anyway is just another hate monger on the loose. And the writer will have the reward due one who writes hate.

There are great possibilities for finding common ground ecumenically, but hate is not one of them.

7 comments:

  1. To keep this person out of the parking lot and environs... how about a restraining order? I know we are supposed to have compassion for those "on the edge" --but what if this is a beginning of a Westboro type barrage?

    Their mission: "King of Kings is rooted in the Spiritual Truths of the Word of God and the tradition of Faith in Action established in the Early Church. As a member of the Anglican Church of North America and Forward in Faith, we are committed to witnessing Christ Jesus and protecting the integrity of the Body of Christ here on Earth until He returns for us all."

    --that's an awful lot of capital letters....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Margaret....St. Peter's has no parking lot. So people park the street. If they stay off the property the city rules on solicitation come into play. We will see.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Perhaps you could turn the lemons into lemonade by having a church project where people make origami doves out of the hate missives. They could then be hung on a tree in honor of God's love and inclusiveness for Pentecost.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nothing profound to offer just a continuing wonderment mixed with frustration about how the message of Christ can be seemingly so passionately embraced by groups who have distinctly different Scriptural interpretations from one another and consequently turn all that into a Us vs You hate message. It must be the translation I use because I can't find the passages where Jesus says "If they don't agree with us, stone them and run off with all they have." Of course, I never engage in any rock-throwing myself - ok, maybe a small pebble now and then.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I appreciate Gods Will for me and it is mostly NOT hand delivered by self-righteous better-than-thou's on the hustle. I imagine others will ignore them too (for the sake of ones own spiritual good health)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Philip Wainwright11/5/14 5:09 PM

    The ACNA bishops may not know anything about this. I'd print out your post and send it to them and see if they respond.

    ReplyDelete
  7. DID THE 1ST CENTURY CHURCH HAVE NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES?

    The prevailing thought of many is that since the Bible was not canonized until sometime between 300 and 400 A.D. that the church of Christ did not have New Covenant Scriptures as their guide for faith and practice. That is simply factually incorrect.

    The Lord's church of the first 400 years did not rely on the man-made traditions of men for New Testament guidance.

    Jesus gave the terms for pardon 33 A.D. after His death and resurrecting. (Mark 16:16) All the words of Jesus were Scripture.Jesus did not have to wait for canonization of the New Testament in order for His word to be authorized.

    The terms for pardon were repeated by the apostle Peter 33 A.D. on the Day of Pentecost. (Acts 2:22-42) The teachings of the apostles were Scripture. The words of the apostles were Scripture before they were canonized.

    The apostle Peter said the apostle Paul's words were Scripture. (2 Peter 3:15-16...just as also our beloved brother Paul , according to the wisdom given him, wrote to you, 16 as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand,which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures...

    The apostle Paul's letters and words were Scriptures when he wrote and spoke them. Paul did not have to wait for canonization to authorize his doctrine.

    John 14:25-26 'These things I have spoken to you while abiding with you. 26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to you remembrance all that I said to you.

    The words and writings of the apostles were Scripture and they did not have to wait for canonization to be deemed authoritative. The apostle did not use man-made creed books of the church or man-made oral traditions to teach the gospel of the New Covenant.

    Did the early church have written New testament Scriptures? Yes, and they were shared among the different congregations. (Colossians 4:16 When the letter is read among you, have it read in the church of the Laodiceans and you, for your part read my letter that is coming from Laodica.) Paul's letters were Scripture and they were read in different churches.

    They were New Testament Scriptures long before they were canonized.

    WRITTEN

    Matthew A.D. 70
    Mark A.D. 55
    Luke between A.D. 59 and 63
    John A.D. 85
    Acts A.D. 63
    Romans A.D. 57
    1 Corinthians A.D. 55
    2 Corinthians A.D. 55
    Galatians A.D. 50
    Ephesians A.D. 60
    Philippians A.D. 61
    Colossians A. D. 60
    1 Thessalonians A.D. 51
    2 Thessalonians A.D. 51 or 52
    1 Timothy A.D. 64
    2 Timothy A.D. 66
    Titus A.D. 64
    Philemon A.D. 64
    Hebrews A.D. 70
    James A.D. 50
    1 Peter A.D. 64
    2 Peter A.D. 66
    1 John A.D. 90
    2 John A.d. 90
    3 John A.D. 90
    Jude A.D. 65
    Revelation A.D. 95

    All 27 books of the New Testament were Scripture when they were written. They did not have wait until they were canonized before they became God's word to mankind.

    Jesus told the eleven disciples make disciples and teach them all that He commanded. (Matthew 28:16-19) That was A.D. 33, They were teaching New Covenant Scripture from A.D. 33 forward. The apostles did not wait to preach the gospel until canonization occurred 300 to 400 years later.

    THE WORDS OF JESUS AND THE APOSTLES WERE SCRIPTURE WHEN THEY WERE SPOKEN AND WRITTEN. THEY DID NOT HAVE TO WAIT FOR CANONIZATION TO BE THE AUTHORIZED WORD OF GOD.

    MAN-MADE CREED BOOKS AND MAN-MADE ORAL TRADITION WAS AND IS NOT SCRIPTURE.

    YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY BLOG. http//:steve-finnell.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete

OK... Comments, gripes, etc welcomed, but with comment moderation but with some cautions and one rule:
Cautions: Calling people fools, idiots, etc, will be reason to bounce your comment. Keeping in mind that in the struggles it is difficult enough to try to respect opponents, we should at least try.
Rule: PLEASE DO NOT SIGN OFF AS ANONYMOUS: BEGIN OR END THE MESSAGE WITH A NAME - ANY NAME. ANONYMOUS commentary will be cut.