-->
The 2018 statistical reports for the Episcopal Church are
out. There is considerable wringing of hands and some very enlightening
commentary around. Among the most challenging is the commentary by Crusty OldDean, Tom Furgerson. His conclusions present
one sort of challenge for TEC, namely to get off the high horse of acting like
a corporation. I hope the General Convention will listen to him. Unfortunately,
the track record on critical rethinking by TEC is not good. The last round of
efforts to deal with the structural problems of TEC fell decidedly flat.
Hidden in the weeds of the Statistical Reports are
interesting bits of information regarding the resilience of at least one
diocese in TEC. On the basis of the records received from the dioceses, it
would appear that the Episcopal Church in Haiti, with 89,717 baptized members,
is the largest diocese in TEC. And, looking at ASA (Average Sunday Attendance)
figures, it ranks among the top 10 dioceses. It is among only 8 dioceses that
have recorded an increase over the last 10 years, and this in spite of the
terrible earthquake of 2010. It has more
members than Province 6 or 9. About one in 20 baptized members of TEC is
Haitian.
The Episcopal Church in Haiti is remarkably resilient. Even
with the horrendous earthquake, governmental and economic uncertainty and accusations
and counter-accusations within the leadership of the church, the church has continued
in its ministry and is growing.
It is within this context that The Venerable Fritz Bazin has
challenged the Episcopal Diocese in Haiti and The Episcopal Church to a conversation about the future for a more autonomous Church in Haiti.
Archdeacon
Bazin is an honorary canon of the Episcopal Church in Haiti and in the Diocese of
South East Florida he is Archdeacon for Immigration and Social Justice.
On July 30, 2019, Archdeacon Bazin wrote the following to
church leaders in Haiti and officers of The Episcopal Church:
“On July 19th the Anglican Communion News Service posted a
photo of Archbishop Fred Hiltz of Canada, anointing the leader of Canada’s
National Indigenous Anglican Church. This gesture clearly points to
a courageous action of the Canadian Church to grant a certain autonomy to this
indigenous Anglican expression.
Bishop Mark McDonald, now Archbishop of this Indigenous
church said “people often misinterpret what we’re doing as an attempt at
independence away from the church. We really wish to become an
indigenous expression of the church and we are only asking for freedom and
dignity that other Anglicans already enjoy.
Although there are various reasons that often cause
misunderstanding between the mother church and her former “missions” now
Dioceses, what took place in Canada invites us all to look at the need for
greater autonomy of the churches in countries of marked cultural differences.
In 2001, the late Canon Jacques Bossiere published a study
in French entitled “L’ame de Anglicanisme” in which he points to the need to
“deanglicise” the Anglican communion, meaning that Anglicans in Africa, Latin
America or the Caribbean do not need to resemble the church in Great Britain,
in Ecclesiology, Liturgy and Theology as long as they preserve the basic
tenants of Anglicanism.
Our Episcopal Church today is an international structure,
yet it is still in the image of the church in the United States of America. The
Canons of the Church in Haiti, The Dominican Republic or Honduras reflect the
American form of governance, liturgical practices and theological positions in
almost every area of the faith.
Exploring the possibility of granting the greatest possible
autonomy to our overseas churches would offer a more powerful testimony of the
spirit of Anglicanism.
I am inviting the church in Haiti and the general leadership
of the Episcopal Church to prayerfully initiate dialogue towards a special
autonomy of the Haitian Church within the structures of the Episcopal Church.”
As TEC prepares for the work of the 2021 General Convention,
the Church is challenged to consider the possibility of “a special autonomy of
the Haitian Church within the structures of the Episcopal Church.”
My sense is that among the concerns that need to be part of
that dialogue on special autonomy we will find the following:
(i)
There have been wide-ranging discussions in
Haiti of dividing the current single diocese into 4 dioceses, with appropriate
changes in expectations of and provisions for the episcopate – “locally adapted
in the methods of its administration” to the Haitian context. (see the Lambeth
Quadrilateral.) This concerns the church being self-propagating.
(ii)
A change in expectations of engagement in the
life of TEC so that the burdens of TEC engagement do not put a strain on the
resources of The Episcopal Church in Haiti. (ECH). (This concerns changing the representation of
ECH at General Convention, representation in the House of Bishops, and provision
for canonical differences reflecting the Haitian context.) This concerns the
church being self-governing.
(iii)
There will have to be a clear understanding of
the extent to which the ECH is financially dependent or independent of TEC support,
and a greater sense of its ability to be self-sustaining.
That is, the ECH and TEC are being challenged to a dialogue
concerning the Henry Venn’s marks of indigenous churches: that they be self-governing,
self-propagating, and self-sustaining. At the same time, ECH and TEC need also to take
the Canadian model seriously: that autonomy does not mean the dissolution of unity
with others, but rather greater regard for the uniqueness of ministries within
the body of the Church. Autonomy can be enjoyed in mutual responsibility and
interdependence.
The stretch for a new future for the Episcopal Church in
Haiti is a reality. We in TEC need to stretch too to meet the Church in Haiti at
a place of dialogue where such a future can be celebrated by the whole body of
the Church.
Deanglicanize so that the liturgy and theology need not be “Anglican”? Maybe this is badly worded, but I’d be surprised if Haitian Episcopalians are as attracted as the US archdeacon to getting rid of prayer-book theology and liturgy. Both the theology and the liturgy that authoritatively expresses it are of the esse of the Anglican Communion. Beyond those two, so many things can be different! Look up the Zairean use of the Roman Rite in the RCC for a good example.
ReplyDeleteThe Book of Common Prayer is not a bit of Elizabethan or Victorian nostalgia. It’s our best effort to continue the essential traditions of the church universal, to embody the faith and practice of the Christian church of the first five centuries. Leave it behind, and we quickly have no Anglican “tenants” (or rather tenets” to offer the world.
Again, listen to the Church in Haiti. If you want to root out colonialism, start with the colonialist projection that THEY want to or should ditch the theology and liturgy of Hooker and Cranmer.