This is a sermon I preached at St. Peter's a week ago. I was somewhat dissatisfied with it, but on reflection I think it is worth posting. The core of the sermon is that we can learn from the poor and the poor in spirit, and that Jesus did.
Last week there were several commentators who believed that little attention was paid at the national political conventions to the issues of poverty. Several religious leaders asked the Democratic and Republican candidates to speak to the issues of poverty. Following the sermon I have posted the Youtube versions of their responses.
Learning from the Poor: Sermon for Sunday September 9.
Let God alone be praised.
I’ve been following Jesus
about 66years. I date the beginning from the time I was in the hospital in Maracaibo
with the mumps. I was six. The priest of the parish came to see me. He had to
wear a hospital gown and mask for fear of infection. I was very impressed.
From that time forward I must
have figured if this man who came to see me was following Jesus, I could too. I’m
now seventy-two and still walking the walk…still following. Over the years I’ve
learned a thing or two about Jesus and about myself. I’ve also come to realize that I can still
learn new things. Why, just last
Saturday I learned that spending an hour or so working on my boat by leaning
back and out over the water, holding on with the left hand and working with the
right can lead to a sprained back. All
week long now I’ve been absorbing the effects of the learning… I’ve learned I’m
not so young and there are careful and stupid ways of doing things. The
learning goes on.
Over the almost twenty
centuries since Jesus was first among us we have come to think of Jesus as God
present with us – and so he is. At the
same time the earliest report is that he was like us in every way, but without
sin.
One of the questions that
comes up from time to time is this: Did Jesus have to learn the way we do? If he was God with us, surely he knew the
meaning of life, the end of things, the truth about judgment and forgiveness,
you know… all that, all along. At the
same time, if he was really human, he had to learn to walk, to talk, to read,
to tie his shoes, and on and on. Even God had to learn just how delicious fried
fish can be, and one supposes even God had to learn about touch from human
merely beings.
So Jesus grew up and knew the
world in the context of Jewish life. Maybe
he knew always that God is both just and merciful, being God with us. But I bet
he had to learn about regular ol’ practical stuff of Jewish life the regular
ol’ way. Saying prayers in Hebrew and
learning to read. The joy of the
Passover meal, viewed from the standpoint of being human and the fine points of
honoring your father and your mother. And he learned also that the Messiah was
to come to save the people Israel. He learned that the Messiah was first for
the children of the Jewish faith.
The Gospel this morning
records an event which is puzzling, unless it is understood as a learning
event. To recap: Jesus is in the area of Sidon in what is now Lebanon. A
gentile woman comes to Jesus, reverences him, and begs him to cure her daughter
of a demon. His response was, “Let the children be fed
first, for it is not fair to take the children's food and throw it to the
dogs."
There is almost no way for this not to mean that Jesus understood that
he came for the Jews, not for the “dogs” that is the unclean foreigners. (Matthew 15:21-28 spells this our more
clearly). And there is almost no way he
is not calling the woman and her daughter “dogs.” Not exactly good pastoral
practice! Imagine walking down the
hallway in a hospital and someone walking up, “Ah, father, a blessing for my
sick daughter.” And responding, “I’m sorry, I came to bless Episcopalians, not
scum.”
Jesus had absorbed the culture well. The hope for the Messiah, as Jews
understood it, was for a savior of Israel, not a savior of all people. As for calling others “dogs,” culture is like
that. Enough of us are given to saying the priest of the parish is here first
for us, and later for others, or that so and so is a real pig, etc.
The woman responds, "Sir, even the dogs under the table eat the
children's crumbs."
Oops! I think she catches Jesus up short.
She doesn’t argue the fine point about how she and her people are
viewed by Jews. She’s single-minded. She is there to be fed, she is there to
get her child well.
This story is recounted in both Mark and Matthew. It is a story held as
valuable by the writers, even if it is embarrassingly human. Something is going
on here.
I think what this story is marking is a change in Jesus’ understanding
of his mission. A learning. It didn’t
just happen here. It happened as he went about living and teaching and healing
among the poor, who as the poor ceased to be Jew or Gentile, but poor and
hurting. But this story is a micro-cosmism of his learning. He learns that the
poor and the poor in spirit are the people beloved of God, and close to the
heart of God in Jesus, and that the Good News is for all people. He learns it
from being with the poor who ask for bread and the bread of life.
He learns, the way we all do. He learns from being confronted by the
truth. All need to be fed by Justice and Mercy and God’s presence.
And, friends, mark this: He learned it from a woman.
I believe that Jesus, the Son
of God, learned what his work was the same way we all do: by practice, by
engagement with others, by listening and responding and loving and caring for
others. He knew full well who he was,
but he had to learn what that meant from all of us regular paid up sinners. He
had to be human and learn.
Now to something else in
today’s readings:
You will note that the Hebrew
Scripture and the Epistle both talk about the poor. Proverbs says,
“The rich and the poor have
this in common: the LORD is the maker of them all. Do not rob the poor because
they are poor, or crush the afflicted at
the gate; for the LORD pleads their cause and despoils of life those who
despoil them.”
And James writes, : Has not God chosen the poor in the world to be rich in faith
and to be heirs of the kingdom that he has promised to those who love him? But
you have dishonored the poor…You do well if you really fulfill the royal
law according to the scripture, "You shall love your neighbor as
yourself."
Now I note that in all the
political drumbeating of these past weeks the Middle Class, of whom we are
mostly members, gets lots of attention. But the poor (however defined) get
almost none. Why is this?
Serious poverty is so
difficult that many of us either don’t want to think about it at all, or if we
do we do so in fear.
It is not part of any
candidates Good News plan. Better to project onto the Middle Class the hopes
for the future. As for the poor, we hear
giving them getting a “leg up,” so that they can ride out of poverty into the
blessings of the mainstream.
But the readings remind us
that God has a preference for the Poor. Not just in the abstract, but for the
beggar by the gate, the neighbor who is neighbor, even if poor. The woman with the kid in the emergency room
and too many mouths to feed and too little money.
Jesus learned from the poor
and the poor in spirit just how wide the need was for people to be fed by both
food and hope, and we must learn from them as well. And we hope that learning will shape our own
ministries and that of our leaders as well, as it apparently did the ministry of
Jesus.
The thing is, if Jesus can
learn, so can we.
That’s all I have to say.
Amen.
bcaouGood going, Mark. I sent your poem about the conventions and the poor to my kids and brother. In response our eldest, Lars, sent this:
ReplyDeleteFrom Sinead O'Connor's "V.I.P." on her excellent new album:
When we're standing at the gates
After being fashionably late,
There'll be no make up and there'll be no film crews,
No Vuitton bags and no Manolo shoes,
When he's presiding over you,
Asking you, "Did you love only you?
Or did you stand for something else?"
Harvey